<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Wave First Look</title>
	<atom:link href="http://emilychang.com/2009/09/google-wave-first-look/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://emilychang.com/2009/09/google-wave-first-look/</link>
	<description>At the intersection of design, tech, creativity and culture</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 07:28:49 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://emilychang.com/2009/09/google-wave-first-look/comment-page-1/#comment-1010</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 12:42:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emilychang.com/?p=1956#comment-1010</guid>
		<description>I was really glad to read this towards the end of the review:

&lt;blockquote&gt;&quot;Wave is only as good as how many of the people you work (and play) with have it.&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I&#039;d change this slightly and say:

&lt;blockquote&gt;&quot;Wave is only as good as how many of the people you work (and play) with have AND use it.&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

There are some really useful tools out there, let down by poor adoption. All too often, the &quot;cool&quot; factor overshadows any consideration  of how something as different as wave might be adopted by the population at large.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was really glad to read this towards the end of the review:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Wave is only as good as how many of the people you work (and play) with have it.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>I&#8217;d change this slightly and say:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Wave is only as good as how many of the people you work (and play) with have AND use it.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>There are some really useful tools out there, let down by poor adoption. All too often, the &#8220;cool&#8221; factor overshadows any consideration  of how something as different as wave might be adopted by the population at large.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
